Sabtu, 07 April 2012

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

God-or Gorilla: How The Monkey Theory Of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), By Alfred Watterson McCann. Discovering how to have reading routine resembles learning how to attempt for consuming something that you truly do not desire. It will certainly need more times to help. Furthermore, it will certainly also little bit force to offer the food to your mouth and swallow it. Well, as reviewing a publication God-or Gorilla: How The Monkey Theory Of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), By Alfred Watterson McCann, sometimes, if you ought to check out something for your new works, you will really feel so woozy of it. Even it is a book like God-or Gorilla: How The Monkey Theory Of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), By Alfred Watterson McCann; it will make you feel so bad.

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann



God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

PDF Ebook God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

Excerpt from God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own CaseThe world has all but forgotten the "Moon Hoax." Only very old men and women now remember those wonderful discoveries in the moon by Sir John Herschel in his observations at the Cape of Good Hope. The "facts" were first published by Richard Adams Locke in the New York Sun in 1835, as Ernst Haeckel and the Darwinians were preparing to trifle with the human mind in a manner unparalleled in history. The moon facts were so plausibly constructed as to deceive not only the public at large, but many scientific men. So great were the "wonders" that they were published separately in various editions in America and Europe. For forty years men talked about them and as late as 1872 the celebrated English mathematician, Augustus De Morgan, declared ("Budget of Paradoxes," London), that the real author of the hoax was none other than J. N. Nicollet, a French astronomer in the United States.Of far greater significance and of more enduring influence is the ape-man hoax now scattering its corruptions throughout the world and impressing its deceptions upon the world's "best minds."Reaching its climax in 1921, the ape-man hoax took the form of a seemingly spontaneous movement to reestablish the theory of man's monkey-origin.About the PublisherForgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.comThis book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #5170837 in Books
  • Published on: 2015-09-27
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 9.02" h x .93" w x 5.98" l, 1.35 pounds
  • Binding: Paperback
  • 462 pages
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann


God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

Where to Download God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

Most helpful customer reviews

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. McCann was way ahead of his time! By Paul G. Humber The Lone Ranger of bygone years was described as “one of the most mysterious characters to appear in the early days of the west … a fabulous individual,” but Alfred Watterson McCann had the additional advantage of being real. He was/is also somewhat mysterious, but his book, God—Or Gorilla is close to being magnificent.Born in the “west,” as in western PA (Pittsburgh – 1879), he received a Doctor of Letters degree from Duquesne and a Doctor of Law degree from Fordham. He also was a spokesman on WOR radio for a considerable time and was a leader in the crusade for clean foods.Why was he close to being magnificent? He was miles ahead of his time relative to the impotency of evolutionary speculations . Not only did he express himself in print about the Piltdown Hoax long before the evolutionary community owned up to the fraudulency , but he also exposed the evolutionary guru of the era, Henry F. Osborn, as an unworthy witness for the truth. Additionally, his words written in the early 1920s seem almost prophetic in describing the present evolutionary dominance and bigotry. He wrote, for example:Preaching this doctrine, the materialistic evolutionists, falsifying their unscientific deductions and misrepresenting the honest research of the laboratories, have so influenced popular education, including the text-books of the schools and the formation of public thought through the press, that there is left scarcely any channel of public information through which does not flow the false conviction that man’s origin as a descendant of the ape has been “scientifically demonstrated.”Why is it that we humans are so ready to believe evolutionary nonsense? Could it be that we do not like the sexual restrictions put on us by our Creator? If we can delude ourselves into believing that everything came from nothing (without reference to God), then why not live like animals? The Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator and Regulator of Sex , is also “dissed” today like He was during McCann’s time, like He was 2,000 years ago on a cross, and even like He was 6,000 years ago when He tested our first parents – who in turn disobeyed Him.On pages 3-4 in his book, McCann wrote, “In propping up the ape- jaw and human-cranium of the ‘reconstructed’ Piltdown man the opinions of various scientific authorities are set forth with such flourishes as to insinuate the impression that the scientists are singularly agreed among themselves in the matter of Mr. Piltdown 's affairs and their significance.”On page 11, the author offers these words: “The writer suffers quite as much amazement as thatreported by Mr. Dawson, to discover the 1921 illustrations of the Piltdown man as they continue, unashamed, to adorn pages 142, 143 and 145 of Professor Henry Fairfield Osborn's latest contribution to science.”There are at least 17 illustrations in McCann’s book. In the one that appears opposite page 14, there is a picture of a red howler monkey (not presented here). McCann’s caption reads as follows: “It was one of those tails that Haeckel cut off in fabricating his embryo illustrations.”Many people do not realize that pre-Hitler Germany was strongly influence by evolutionary nonsense (as in many German people thinking of themselves as being the most fit to survive), and Haeckel was a leader in this effort. Falsifying drawings of embryos was another evolutionary fraud – perhaps even worse than the Piltdown Hoax.On pages 99-100, McCann gives this delightful quotation concerning the Scientific Giant Louis Pasteur: “These are the living springs of great thoughts and great actions," said Pasteur. “Everything grows clear in the reflection from the Infinite. The more I know the more nearly is my faith that of the Breton peasant. If I could know all I would have the faith of a Breton peasant woman. Happy the man who bears with him a divinity, an ideal of beauty and obeys it ; an ideal of art, an ideal of science, an ideal of country, an ideal of the virtues of the gospel."Pasteur was a Roman Catholic, and I suspect McCann was, too. It is nice to see him indirectly affirming the Gospel using the words of Pasteur.A few pages further McCann wrote: “Here, again, they were being influenced by Haeckel, who developed the biogenetic principle by which he sought to show that man before his birth passes through twenty-two stages of development, later brought up to thirty stages, corresponding with the same number of stages of his ancestors, including the whole outfit, jellyfish, tadpole, etc., terminating in the monkey and through the monkey by way of Homo stupidus, into man” (p. 105).It seems that “Homo stupidus” was a label created by Haeckel, but I rather suspect that McCann was using it also somewhat mockingly of evolutionism itself.As stated in the title, McCann was/is somewhat “mysterious.” There is some mystery surrounding his early death , and his faith is not everywhere apparent. There is a glimpse into his heart, however, from this passage: “(H.G.) Wells does not like the idea that from a state of grace man fell after he had been endowed with a free will to do good or evil as he might see fit. Wells does not like the Incarnation, the Atonement, the Resurrection. He dismisses Christ altogether. In his ape-man pedigree there is no place for Christ. He will accept none of the clear and uncompromising demands made by Jesus of Nazareth for an absolute faith in Himself. The Son of Man is to be described, if described at all, as the Son of Ape” (p. 142).It seems clear from this that McCann had regard for the Lord Jesus and scorn for any notion of connecting Jesus to evolution.Returning to Henry Fairfield Osborn, president of the New York Zoological Society and president of the American Museum of Natural History, as being a poor witness for the truth, one may consult pages 265-267. McCann wrote, “The whole story of the charges concerning the faking of charts, the attempt to discredit scientific witnesses and the manufacture of data designed to create false impressions is fully covered by the U. S. Government report of the hearings, pages 705-796, and 897-1013.”He also offered the following conclusion: ‘With all this evidence to assist him in the formulation of a correct opinion, Professor Osborn was dismally and abysmally wrong. Yet back there 500,000 years ago, with not a solitary fossil relic of any kind to aid him, he remains sublimely certain of the scientific accuracy of his opinion that man has descended from an ape of which there is no living type or fossil remains in existence.”“Like flame in straw”But was it not the overwhelming evidence of science that persuaded so many people so quickly? No. McCann referred to Lyells’ Principles of Geology which appeared in 1830 – “when Darwin was twenty-two years of age” (p. 314). Lyells’ conclusion “was that the continuous operation of geological processes (volcanic eruptions, rivers wearing away their banks, etc.) over an almost incalculable period of time, would be sufficient to explain how the earth had assumed its present physical appearance. This conclusion spread like flame in straw, and with it the acceptance of inferences which made the Bible look like the Official Organ of Falsehood. True to Darwin's prophecy it produced a revolution but not altogether like the revolution which Darwin anticipated.” McCann did not witness Hitler’s forced survival-of-the-fittest, as he, McCann, died mysteriously at age 52, but his words, again, seem almost prophetic (cf. again endnote #xi).A little further down the page we read, “The geologists, eagerly adopting Lyell’s views, began to give to man an age of at least 1,000,000 years, and to the world an age of ‘many’ millions of years. So rapid was the growth of this idea that by 1872 Lyell’s work had gone through eleven different editions, and had provided the ‘enemies of religion’ with an arsenal of ‘scientific’ shells to hurl at the ‘six days’ of the Bible. The ‘struggle for existence’ was already a phrase, galloping on its way to war.”Only “close to being magnificent”?Above, I wrote that McCann’s book, God—Or Gorilla, was “close to being magnificent.” The reason is that he, though giving some arguments in defense of a young earth view, seemed to regard an old earth view as being possible, but there are many scientific reasons for disbelieving old-earth scenarios. The reader is invited to go online and order my Reasons to Affirm a Young Earth booklet (I served as editor) at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0985516917.There are also biblical reasons for rejecting old-earth-ism. Here is one: the One who owns all of our bones as Artist and Creator spoke these words about our first parents: “But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female’” (Mark 10:6). The Lord Jesus did not place Adam and Eve at the end of creation – but at the beginning! If the earth is 4.54 billion years old (as many profess), then Adam and Eve appeared at the “end” of creation as we now know it. Why? Because 6,000 years is a mere drop in the bucket when compared to 4,540,000,000 years. Our parents would have arrived on the scene after 99.99% of earth’s history had passed! So why would Jesus, Truth Personified (John 14:6), say that our first parents were “from the beginning of creation” if they actually came at the end? Should we believe the One who was there or Darwin who was not? Darwin also died, as did Jesus, but there is a huge difference! Jesus, also Life Personified, smashed Death in the teeth three days later and will someday raise everyone who has ever walked this planet – including Darwin, Haeckel, Osborn, and McCann (John 5:28-29) – to face Him.Jesus came as a baby the first time, but He comes as King of kings the second time around. Continue trusting the lying media if you choose, but I join with Joshua: “And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”

See all 1 customer reviews... God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann


God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann PDF
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann iBooks
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann ePub
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann rtf
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann AZW
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann Kindle

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann
God-or Gorilla: How the Monkey Theory of Evolution Exposes Its Own Methods, Refutes Its Own Principles, Denies Its Own Inferences, Disproves Its Own Case (Classic Reprint), by Alfred Watterson McCann

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar